I think smaller niche themes like the moroccan kit and gameplay kits like bust the dust are good themes to go for, not this exactly because something will always be missing if the budget don't let you complete the theme. I think this could have been a stuff pack instead. Where I am it's not really that expensive, so I'm okay with what we get, but I think the themes are a bit hit and miss. I definitely think they could add more to these kits because they're really pricey IMO. I mean, while I've had this problem less in The Sims and more in working with Graphic art, I've had plenty of times when I've had two similarly meshed items where one just fit the scene better than the other, even if they were objectively practically the same item. Last I checked, no version of Sims has an option to include Style Morphs for either furniture or clothing, so any change that can't be done with a displacement, bump, or normal map (which is any change in the angle of the structure, or gaps in the mesh, or large changes to size - including removal) needs a new mesh, or at least an edit of the old one. Create a Style isn't going to change the direction on the legs of the Bar chairs, or remove curtains from the bed (not to mention change the shape of the headboard), and those are the two items in the pack that I think are the most similar to existing ones. Yes, game changers should give their opinion, but they should not perpetuate misinformation to gain followers, which is the issue I have with some of them. We can only recolour or retexture stuff with CASt, not remesh them. TS3 had CASt and sold remeshed objects as well. I miss CASt as well, but I don’t think they purposely excluded it so they can sell recolours or remeshes. Remeshes take longer to make than recolours, but less time than new gameplay objects. So if they are not identical in shape, then they are remeshes not recolours. They're entertainers, not marketing departments. I think game changers should absolutely give their opinions, btw. But the step backwards definitely has profit potential for EA. Didn't Sims 2 also have a out-of-game program to recolor and retexture items? I don't even remember. It was more an issue with CASt not being part of Sims 4 despite it being in a previous iteration. Many pieces look like they could not survive a game with CASt. Do they look identical? No, they look like recolors. Hah, after watching his video, I will say, yes, definitely look like recolors of included items. I’ve noticed that many of them are now just trying to promote their own social media instead of the game so are agreeing with whatever is said by their followers without regard for truth. I think EA game changers should stick to influencing us to buy the game. Some CC creators are already making big money and don’t need EA’s help Some CC creators make non-Maxis match content which I don’t want in my gameĥ. Harry’s content isn’t the worst, but also isn’t the best that I’ve seenĤ. Some CC creators make really bad content. If I wanted to use CC, I would already be doing so and supporting themģ. CC should remain free for those who cannot afford paid contentĢ. I hope EA does not listen to him about using cc creators to make kits as I think:ġ. Not everyone has already bought all those packs. I just watched the video that James Turner made and the stuff he used look nothing like what’s shown in the photo I saw of the kit content.Įven if you think they do look alike, people would need to buy a bunch of packs to get all the content he used instead of only buying a $5.00 kit. And this is why CASt will never come back. A lot of those items look like reskins recolors of items already in the game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |